FDA has published a Federal RegisterNotice announcing a significant change in how it prospectively will handle public comments submitted on rulemakings and other docketed matters by individuals in their individual capacity.
Since the adoption of the government-wide electronic portal system for submitting and posting comments, FDA generally has not posted public comments submitted by individuals in their individual capacity at Regulations.gov. Instead, such individuals’ comments have been made available only in the public reading room at the Agency’s dockets branch, or through submission of a FOIA request. FDA developed the practice largely because of concerns about disclosing personal information of individuals who may not have realized, when submitting their comments, that their names, addresses, and other identifying information would be publicly viewable. That practice is changing.
After October 15, 2015, all comments to any FDA docket, existing or new, submitted electronically through Regulations.gov, or submitted by mail or delivery to the Division of Dockets Management in written/paper format, generally will be posted to the applicable docket and publicly viewable on Regulations.gov. However, an exception will apply to comments submitted in written/paper format under the following conditions:
The written/paper submission is marked as confidential, and
The submitter provides an unredacted and a redacted version (i.e., the redacted version must have the information claimed as confidential redacted/blacked out).
If submitted under these conditions, only the redacted written/paper submission would be posted publicly on Regulations.gov (except as otherwise provided by 21 C.F.R. § 10.20 or other law).
This change in practice is intended to increase the transparency and utility of FDA’s public dockets. Moreover, the change fulfills a recommendation from the 2010 FDA Transparency Initiative aligns with Recommendation No. 2013-4 from the Administrative Conference of the United States, and furthers an objective in Executive Order 13563, which directs agencies to base their regulations on “public participation and an open exchange of ideas.”
Disclaimer: The content provided on this blog is intended for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information presented by OFW Law is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information regarding our practice areas, laws and regulations change frequently; therefore, we cannot guarantee that all information is current or applicable to your specific situation. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in this site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in your state. All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this site is hereby expressly disclaimed.
FDA Dockets Transparency To Be Enhanced
Reach out to our team for assistance with your legal and regulatory needs.
Table of Contents
FDA has published a Federal Register Notice announcing a significant change in how it prospectively will handle public comments submitted on rulemakings and other docketed matters by individuals in their individual capacity.
Since the adoption of the government-wide electronic portal system for submitting and posting comments, FDA generally has not posted public comments submitted by individuals in their individual capacity at Regulations.gov. Instead, such individuals’ comments have been made available only in the public reading room at the Agency’s dockets branch, or through submission of a FOIA request. FDA developed the practice largely because of concerns about disclosing personal information of individuals who may not have realized, when submitting their comments, that their names, addresses, and other identifying information would be publicly viewable. That practice is changing.
After October 15, 2015, all comments to any FDA docket, existing or new, submitted electronically through Regulations.gov, or submitted by mail or delivery to the Division of Dockets Management in written/paper format, generally will be posted to the applicable docket and publicly viewable on Regulations.gov. However, an exception will apply to comments submitted in written/paper format under the following conditions:
If submitted under these conditions, only the redacted written/paper submission would be posted publicly on Regulations.gov (except as otherwise provided by 21 C.F.R. § 10.20 or other law).
This change in practice is intended to increase the transparency and utility of FDA’s public dockets. Moreover, the change fulfills a recommendation from the 2010 FDA Transparency Initiative aligns with Recommendation No. 2013-4 from the Administrative Conference of the United States, and furthers an objective in Executive Order 13563, which directs agencies to base their regulations on “public participation and an open exchange of ideas.”
Disclaimer: The content provided on this blog is intended for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The information presented by OFW Law is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information regarding our practice areas, laws and regulations change frequently; therefore, we cannot guarantee that all information is current or applicable to your specific situation. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in this site without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from an attorney licensed in your state. All liability with respect to actions taken or not taken based on the contents of this site is hereby expressly disclaimed.
Last Posts
Bailee Fanning Joins OFW Law
Read MoreMay Food and Agriculture Regulatory Recap
Read MoreApril Food and Agriculture Regulatory Recap
Read More